Release
of A New Local by Local (Abu Sab'in X Garawi) Forage
Sorghum Hybrid
By
Sudan owns the second largest animal wealth in Africa. The
sharp increase in demand for animal products has led to great expansion in the
area allocated to fodder crops. Research efforts aiming at developing improved
forage types were very few. A forage improvement program was therefore
initiated in 2000 at Shambat Research Station. Genetic variability among local
stocks has been exploited and improved forage types from Abu Sab'in , Sudan
Grass and Ankolib populations were developed. Some of these materials were
officially released for commercial production (Mohammed et al., 2008; Mohammed,
2009).
One of the ambitious program objectives was to investigate
the possibility of locally developed forage sorghum hybrids. Such endeavor has
not been attempted, in spite of the immense variability among Sudanese
sorghums. Exploitation of heterosis in developing improved hybrid varieties is
a well documented method. High yielding forage sorghum hybrids have been
developed in many parts of the world.
Early history of hybrid sorghum development in the USA
was reviewed by Maunder (1983). Although the research workers at Texas
Experiment Station became aware of hybrid vigor in sorghum as early as 1920,
the private seed industry of hybrid sorghum has to await the advent of cytoplasmic
male sterility in 1954. Nevertheless, the release of the first forage sorghum
hybrids did not occur until 1959. These were the unwanted crosses of grain
hybrid program which later led to the forage hybrid 'Sudax'.
In the Sudan ,
research efforts before 2001, were mainly confined to testing and releasing of
exotic hybrids. The seed of all hybrids currently in use are imported. Hitherto,
four forage sorghum hybrids were tested and released by the Agricultural
Research Corporation (ARC), namely: Pioneer 988, from Pioneer International Co.
(Ishag, 1989), Speedfeed and Jumbo from Pacific seed Co. (Khair et al., 1995), Pannar
888 from Pannar Seed Co. (Nour et al., 1998) and Safed Moti from Proagro seed
Co. (ElAhmadi et al., 2003). Although these hybrids proved to be good yielders,
yet the farmer’s preference is in favor of the traditional cultivar Abu Sab’in
which was, until the early 1980s, has no competitor as forage sorghum in the Sudan . Most of
the introduced hybrids were mainly designed to suit the grazing or
silage-making systems, whereas, in the Sudan , the cut-and carry (green
chopping) is the prevailing system. The low adoption of introduced hybrids
might also be attributed to the unavailability and high cost of their seeds. Therefore,
the locally developed hybrids will greatly enhance the adoption process by
making available cheap seed of better adapted hybrids.
In pursuing this goal, locally developed hybrids using
exotic females has been attempted (Mohammed, 2004). The results obtained
demonstrate clearly the possibility of developing local hybrids excelling the
introduced ones and the traditional cultivar Abu Sab’in in forage yield. However,
the resulting hybrids were not early in flowering, a character which is highly
valued under the local production system. The exotic females were found
responsible for transmitting lateness and other undesirable traits to their
progenies. Based on these and other findings, the choice for developing local x
local hybrids was thought crucial in resolving problems pertaining to the poor
adoption of forage sorghum hybrid in Sudan . This in turn necessitated
the need for transferring CMS factors to the local stocks, a task that has been
achieved in 2003 by male sterilizing 12 lines selected from the traditional
cultivar ‘Abu Sabin’ in A3 cytoplasm (Mohammed, 2004).
The Abu Sab'in females were crossed to carefully selected
local males chosen from Sudan Grass (Garawi) and Ankolib (local sweet sorghum)
populations plus two exotic males. 87 experimental hybrids were produced and
screened in a replicated nursery in 2005. Thirty eight hybrids were identified
and subjected to preliminary yield testing during 2006, see link :
Twelve hybrids were
chosen for advanced evaluation across four environments. They were tested
against two commercial hybrids: Pannar 888 and Safed Moti; and two local
checks: 'Kambal' (the recommended cultivar) and Abu Sabin. The design used in
most trials was Alpha Lattice. Forage yield of the first and the second cut,
days to flowering, plant height, regrowth ability and some quality traits were
investigated. see link:
The contrast analysis across environments indicated the
superiority of the local hybrids in forage yield over the existing maxima. Some
of the top yielding local hybrids were also significantly earlier than the
introduced ones and the local checks. Of these, the local hybrid SHM0022 was
the best in many attributes, outyielding the introduced (commercial) hybrids
and the local checks with yield advantage ranging from 37% to 73% for the first
cut and at least 149% for the second cut. It was also significantly earlier
than the introduced hybrids and the local checks. Earliness is a highly valued character
under the local green chopping system that requires fast growing, highly
productive cultivars to minimize costs of production (Mohammed et al,
2009). Thus, the hybrid SHM0022 could largely meet the farmer’s preference in
producing high quantities of forage in a relatively short period of time. Moreover,
SHM0022 showed the best protein content (12.3 %.) and regrowth ability. The
release of SHM0022 has been approved by the Variety Release Committee on the 1st
of March 2010 under the name ‘Hagin Garawi’ for irrigated green chopping system.
It was expected to have a major impact on the hybrid seed industry of forage
sorghum in the country as it allows, for the first time, production of cheap
seed of better adapted hybrids.
References
Ishag, H. M.
(1989). Pioneer 988- a forage sorghum
for irrigated Gezira. A report submitted
to the Variety Release Committee. ARC. W. Medani. Sudan .
Khair, M.A.M;
Babiker, E.A.; Ibrahim, B.A. and Mohammed, B. A. (1995). Speedfeed and Jumbo,
new sorghum/Sudan grass hybrids for irrigated areas in the Central
Sudan . A paper submitted to the Variety Release Committee. ARC. W.
Medani. Sudan .
Maunder, B. A.
(1983). Development and perspectives of the hybrid seed industry in the Americas .
In: G. Ejeta Ed., ‘Hybrid Sorghum Seed for Sudan ’. Proceedings. Purdue University .
Pp. 39-48.
Mohammed,
Maarouf I. (2004). Development of male sterile forage sorghum genetic stocks in
A3 cytoplasm. Sudan
Journal of Agricultural Research 4: 89-92
Mohammed,
Maarouf I., Gamal, E. Khalifa, Ghada H. Abdulrahman and Mohammed I. Elmahi.
(2008). Improvement of the traditional forage sorghum cultivar 'Abu Sab'in'. Sudan
Journal of Agricultural Research 11: 25-33
Mohammed, Maarouf I.
(2009). Proposal for the release of improved Sudan Grass types for Khartoum State . A paper presented for the Variety
Release Committee. Khartoum .
Sudan .
Nour, A. M.;
Khair, M. A. M. and Mohammed, B.A. (1998). Performance of forage sorghum
hybrids under Sudan
conditions. A paper submitted to the Variety Release Committee. ARC. W. Medani.
Sudan .
Appendix
VI. Mean squares from contrast analysis of local forage sorghum hybrids vs
other groups based on data for green matter yield (t/ha) of the 1st
cut combined over four environments (2006-08)
Source of
variation
|
d.f.
|
m.s.
|
F pr.
|
Block *Env stratum
|
|||
Environments*(Env)
|
3
|
6849.24
|
<.001
|
Residual
|
6
|
176.11
|
|
Group
|
4
|
3755.26
|
<.001
|
Local hybrids (LH) vs Exotic hybrids (Ex H)
|
1
|
1130.58
|
<.001
|
LH vs Kambal
|
1
|
321.19
|
0.037
|
LH vs
Abu Sab'in (Ab70)
|
1
|
1825.60
|
<.001
|
LH vs Parents (P)
|
1
|
14621.80
|
<.001
|
Env.Group
|
12
|
85.01
|
0.312
|
Env*LH
vs Ex H
|
3
|
123.82
|
0.169
|
Env*LH vs Kambal
|
3
|
73.51
|
0.392
|
Env*LH vs Ab70
|
3
|
8.19
|
0.953
|
Env*LH vs P
|
3
|
174.52
|
0.070
|
Residual
|
274
|
73.28
|
|
Total
|
299
|
Appendix
VII. Mean squares from contrast analysis of local forage sorghum hybrid vs
other groups based on data for green matter yield (t/ha) of the 2nd
cut combined over two environments
Source of
variation
|
d.f.
|
m.s.
|
F pr.
|
Environments (Env)
|
1
|
48.48
|
0.503
|
Residual
|
1
|
49.31
|
|
Block*Env
|
1
|
3.89
|
0.698
|
Residual
|
1
|
14.79
|
|
Group
|
4
|
1701.26
|
<.001
|
Local Hybrids (LH) vs Parents (P)
|
1
|
6370.08
|
<.001
|
L H vs Exotic hybrids (Ex H)
|
1
|
826.52
|
<.001
|
L H vs Kambal
|
1
|
784.97
|
<.001
|
L H vs Abu Sab'in (Ab70)
|
1
|
1054.00
|
<.001
|
Env.Group
|
4
|
6.45
|
0.972
|
Env*L H vs P
|
1
|
0.92
|
0.893
|
Env*L H
vs Ex H
|
1
|
0.08
|
0.968
|
Env*L H
vs Kambal
|
1
|
25.36
|
0.479
|
Env*Lh
Vs Ab70
|
1
|
0.05
|
0.975
|
Residual
|
137
|
50.43
|
|
Total
|
149
|
Appendix III. Description of some
morphological and agronomic characteristics of the local x local forage sorghum
hybrid S.148 x SG34
Character
|
Description
|
Plant color
|
brown
|
Days to 50 % flowering
|
52-57 days
|
Plant height
|
200-250 cm
|
Stalk juiciness
|
Juicy
|
Midrib color
|
green
|
Regrowth ability
|
high
|
Green matter yield of the first cut
|
40-60 t/ha
|
Dry matter yield of the first cut
|
9-14 t/ha
|
Green matter yield of the second cut
|
35-40 t/ha
|
Protein content (at 50 % flowering)
|
12 %
|
No comments:
Post a Comment